Standard & Poor’s says it will appeal against CPDO ruling
Standard & Poor’s has said that it will appeal against an Australian federal court judgment earlier this week over its AAA rating on CPDOs issued in 2006
I see plenty of information in this ruling about S&P’s incompetence. What I can’t find is an explanation of why S&P has a duty of care to investors. Am I missing some nuance of Australian law?
Related Stories
- IIG Global Trade Finance Fund lawsuit targets CLO trustee and noteholders, alleging they reaped gains from fraud that cost fund USD 190m 7 months ago
- Sculptor CEO Levin refutes "personal issue" accusation by ex-chief Och 1 year ago
- Court orders Bancorp to repay Waterfall's deposit from cancelled CRE CLO 2 years ago
- They said it: "I feel vindicated..." 2 years ago
- Trade finance specialist sentenced to 12 years in prison for CLO and fund fraud 2 years ago
CLOs
- WAMCO keeps the resets rolling with rework of 2023 CLO 10 hours ago
- Elmwood resets 2021 vintage US CLO 10 hours ago
- Ares add new European CLO to its roster 10 hours ago
- Sona returns to debut CLO to draw-down single B tranche 10 hours ago
- Blackstone makes it three new European CLOs this year 11 hours ago
Comment by: Anonymous. Posted 11 years ago [2012-11-13 05:29:28]