Being fully invested can have a greater impact on IRRs than avoiding 2% defaults annually
The IRR differential can be as much as 3.3% for a fully invested CLO versus one that maintains a 5% cash balance
This article is available only to Creditflux subscribers and free trial users within 30 days of publication.
Already a subscriber? Not logged in? Click here to login.
This trial will give you:
- 4-weeks' free online access to our
most recent subscriber-only articles
- Daily breaking news alert sent by email
- A print copy of Creditflux
If you currently have a free trial, you will see this message when you try to view articles older than 30 days.
- Global CLO round-up: it's time to rethink benchmarks 4 hours ago
- Global CLO b-wic round-up: control equity hits the market as secondary market picks up 5 hours ago
- Alcentra scores tightest 1.5-year US CLO spread after 2016 deal refinancing 8 hours ago
- CDS has spillover effect on bond liquidity but could cause fire sales, finds BoE researcher 8 hours ago
- Benefit Street slashes 32bp from 2016 CLO's funding costs via refi 9 hours ago
- Investments in CSOs can be more fruitful than in CLOs 11 days ago
- Short-dated CLOs still have life in them 11 days ago
- Pimco plans CLO management return after 12-year absence 11 days ago
- Tranche trading is back: relative value plays power growth 11 days ago
- Insight joins list of firms to jettison plans for European CLOs 11 days ago